The musings of a Deaf Californian on life, politics, religion, sex, and other unmentionables. This blog is not guaranteed to lead to bon mots appropriate for dinner-table conversation; make of it what you will.

The Island Near the Lamp Beside the Golden Door

Blogged under Genealogy, General Commentary, History, Travel by on Wednesday 11 April 2007 at 2:53 pm

New York City, like many port towns, is a city of endings and beginnings. For many in the United States, it’s where our families first entered America, ending their lives in the “Old World” and beginning a new one in a nation seemingly full of possibilities and promise. Until 1954, that point of transition was located by the docks, at Castle Garden, or Ellis Island.

Today’s immigrants frequently arrive by plane, and undergo the journey through customs. While customs can be anything from a relative breeze to a trying experience, it’s nothing compared with the long waits people had to make at times at Ellis Island, or the days of isolation on the West Coast’s Angel Island. A few years ago, we were able to get a slight glimpse of what it might have been like for the European immigrants when we toured Ellis Island, which had recently reopened as a museum. On that particular trip, we only viewed the main building; the rest of the island was closed to the public. There was a vague promise that some buildings and areas might eventually re-open.

It’s about ten years later, and a lot has happened since– not just in NYC, but also in regards to Ellis Island. While no new buildings had opened, immigration records became available online, which is a boon for genealogists like me (most of my ancestors came through other ports, or arrived in NYC earlier, at Castle Garden, so Ellis Island records have been a bust for me. But they might not be for some of you…).

Just last week though, the announcement came that new portions of Ellis Island would again re-open as part of Ellis Island National Monument and the Immigration Museum. Not only is that exciting news for history buffs like me, but it’ll also give the average visitor a chance to see more of what their ancestors might have gone through, and bring home the story of immigration and immigrants a bit more. At a time when there’s been quite a bit of rancor in the press lately over immigration, I think it’d be useful for people to perhaps reflect on where they came from, how their families got here, and how the struggles and challenges of the past enabled them to enjoy the lives they have today.

I’m not sure when I’ll go to NYC again– it’s an expensive town to visit. A friend recently took his family to the city on a day trip, and told me it cost more than he’d planned. I can understand– L.A. isn’t exactly cheap thrills either, if you want to see some of the highlights (the Huntington Library and Gardens, for example, is $15 per person; a single ticket to see the Queen Mary in Long Beach will set you back at least $22.95 for the cheapest tour). But if you plan to go, and you want to see Ellis Island, I suggest you pair it with a visit to the Lower East Side; although it’s far more upscale and trendy compared with the days of Five Points, the Tenement Museum gives you a glimpse into what it was like for immigrants after they left Ellis Island and arrived in Manhattan. I’d like to see this particular museum again, to see what they’ve added, if anything (looks like they’re setting up a new room for the “Irish Immigrant Experience”). It’s definitely an eye-opening experience. You can read books and watch movies that reflect the immigrant experience, but there’s nothing like actually seeing what a two-room apartment that held large families or numerous unrelated individuals, and realizing that we’re fairly spoiled today.

Of course, the area is much different today, and the waves of immigrants that lived in this part of New York have since moved to the suburbs and beyond, where some of their far more prosperous descendants live today. Something worth considering the next time you think immigrants don’t belong here. The family that today works in the orchards picking your fruit and vegetables could very well spawn a child that eventually makes it out of the substandard housing and living conditions in the fields, and have descendants who live next door to your own offspring. It’s happened before…

Dydd Gwyl Dewi hapus!

Blogged under Genealogy, General Commentary, History, Holidays, Mr. Sandman by on Tuesday 1 March 2005 at 7:44 pm

Today is St. David’s Day in Wales, and the Welsh traditionally wear either a leek or a daffodil. The latter seems appropriate, as March always seems to bring with it a hint of spring. Here in L.A., it was definitely springlike. When I went out for my walk this morning, the flowers seemed so fresh, alive and *blooming*. Even though we’re supposed to get more rain this weekend, I know spring is definitely on the way!

The day has a special meaning for me– not only because my name is David, but because I have Welsh ancestry. I’m a typical northern European mutt; there’s a bit of Irish, Welsh, English, Scotch, Norwegian, German, and Russian all mixed together in me. I’ve traced back to Dutch roots as well, and I suspect there’s Native American blood in the woodpile too, but I have yet to definitively prove this. I identify most strongly with my Irish and Welsh roots, partly because the Irish is the most of all the different nationalities, and the Welsh because of my name. But all in all I’m proud of my background, warts and all.

I have been fascinated by history since I was a little boy. Since genealogy is “personal history,” it didn’t take too long for me to make the jump from global events to familial ones. I’ve been an amateur genealogist for nearly twenty years now. Despite the passage of time, I’ve never felt like an “expert”; on the contrary, I learn something new a lot of times: a new fact, a new way of doing things, a new historical background, a new genealogical technique. I’m advanced enough I could probably give basic lessons on how to begin doing genealogy, but I’m still green enough to resort to consulting how-to books, online newsletters, and the like. I’ve been fortunate enough the past fifteen or so years to live within two hours’ drive from a National Archives repository, which has allowed me to mine the censuses.

The census itself is a fascinating document. It’s also tricky to use at times. Until 1850, only the head of household was named; everyone else was merely a sex and an age. After 1860 it gets easier, but you still have to know exactly where your ancestors were at that time. From 1880 to 1920 is the best possible period, thanks to the Soundex. This is an index of the census, created during the New Deal when Social Security was about to begin. As my grandmother (who was the one who introduced me to genealogy) always said, “You don’t need a birth certificate to be born; you don’t need a death certificate to die. But you do need a marriage license to get married.” Back then people didn’t need to have proof of their birth, so aside from baptismal records, marriage licenses, and such documents, people didn’t have any evidence of their age. Since not everyone got baptized, and since people didn’t always get married (or tell the truth about their age when they got hitched!), a different way had to be developed to show proof of age. The gummint, in its eternal wisdom, decided the census would do, since theoretically everyone was recorded every ten years. There needed to be an easy way to look up information fairly quickly, which is where the Soundex came in. I doubt the gummint realized it would be a boon hereafter to genealogists everywhere, but it is.

The 1930 census reverts to the previous status quo: there’s no Soundex for that year. Yet it’s also an interesting year. I recently started using the 1930 census in my work, and it’s the first census to ask whether or not a radio was present in the home. It’s not just a genealogical document, it’s also a sociological piece of work as well. It’s essentially the history of the country: ten years compressed and capsulized in one.

Although I never got around to using the material or analyzing it, a number of censuses in the mid-19th century inquire as to disabilities, including deafness. The last census to do so was 1910; since then, the actual number of deaf people in this country has been a guessing game. The last “census” or survey of any note was done in the early 1970s, I believe. This is where the oft-quoted “approximately 28 million people with a hearing loss” statistic first took shape. I often use this fact when I write letters regarding deaf-related issues, but at the same time I cringe. It’s not possible for that number to be true now, over thirty years later. The incidences of rubella, scarlet fever, and a host of other diseases that usually incited deafness has declined. Yet I have no other means of ascertaining what the approximate population of deaf and hard-of-hearing is either. I’ve often wished the gummint would reinstate this in the census. Not only would it provide more accuracy, it would also help social services agencies assess better where the need is, what programs to offer, and what priorities to focus on. It’d also just be cool in itself: a snapshot of what our country really looks like, beyond the usual questions about housing, number of toilets, number of TVs, etc.

I have noticed that in some online surveys or quizzes, when I’m asked which language is the primary one used in the home, that sometimes ASL is an option. Of course, I proudly check it off. It’s not too often that ASL is recognized in such a fashion!

One drawback I do encounter in genealogical research is the creeping monster known as identity theft. Too many banks, credit card companies, lenders, and similar financial institutions allow access to all kinds of information with just the basics: a birthdate, mother’s maiden name, and similar facts. This means that the last few years has seen a retreat in available materials for genealogists. Too often legislators react to a legitimate problem (identity theft) and overreact by pulling the plug on public records completely, without creating some safeguards instead so that those who legimitately want or need access can do so. Here in California, it used to be you could look up birth and death indexes and information fairly easily. Now on the state level, only birth information prior to the early 1900s is open to the public, and I believe the same for death and marriage. Each county has a different policy. In Orange County, for example, I have to order the certificate and provide as much exact information as I can before they’ll hand over anything. Santa Clara County is far different: there, they’ve computerized their records, and you may look at it online (but not print or get a certified copy without paying!), and if you know the exact information to plug in, you can view the actual certificate on-screen. Most other counties are somewhere in between.

It varies from state to state, and as well from country to country. Canada is starting to really tighten access to information, which worries me as I have some Canadian roots and a lot of unknown names and dates to work with in the Great White North. Still, it’s a great hobby; one of my close friends is also a genealogist, and he and I swap information or chat about it occasionally. I’ll never complete my family tree (and neither will you– there’s always another person’s name to turn up, another line to discover, another fact to verify), but it’ll keep me busy for the rest of my days.

In the meantime, Dydd Gwyl Dewi hapus! Happy St. David’s Day!

Powered by DeafRead Blogs
Don't have a blog yet? Create a new blog and join in the fun!