Reflections and Appreciation
The conference ended nearly two months ago. This blog must, therefore, also come to an end. I’ll be closing the comments fairly soon, but the blog itself (and its individual posts/entries) will remain indefinitely.
While it was not a ground-breaking conference (there have been other Deaf history conferences, most notably Deaf History International’s (DHI) triennial gatherings (the next one is Stockholm in 2009)), it was an exciting one; the focus was ostensibly on Kendall Green and by extension Gallaudet University, but in reality we learned about such disparate topics as Laura Redden Searing, the history of African Deaf communities, deaf immigrants, the history of Kendall School and its black students, and Deaf ministers. This was in addition to more direct institutional history, such as the work of George Detmold, the life of Douglas Craig, mathematics instruction, and much more. Finally, the three keynote speeches addressed the history of the Deaf community and its origins as viewed through the prism of Kendall Green, the conflicts and leadership of the 20th century, and the concept and meanings behind Deafhood.
Some of these papers we may never hear about again; others will be presented again after further research and revisions, and some will be published as articles and books. As previously noted, Chris Krentz’s presentation was derived from his work, which will be published this fall. I expect some of the other information shared during this gathering will be published, such as Harry Lang’s work on Laura Redden Searing.
In any event, those of us in attendance and those of you who have been following this blog are now aware of the rich history that has been uncovered, the additional information that we now know. These new perceptions of historical events and figures will no doubt inspire additional research and work. Historical research and publication is never static; it’s an ongoing process. Both amateur and trained historians have much to contribute to historical research and writing, whether it’s general history, local history, U.S. history, or Deaf history.
I’m not sure about the other attendees, or about the readers of this blog, but for me, the conference whetted my appetite. Deaf history is still a small, new field, but there is still so much work that can and should be done. I’m not sure how or when I’ll contribute, but I hope to share what I can in whatever way I can to increasing the knowledge and understanding we have of Deaf people in America.
The conference was also beneficial in other ways of course; meeting new people, reconnecting with old friends, and forging ties with people who share a common interest in history. It was also interesting being on campus again; like any other college campus, there’s always construction going on, little changes here and there, and of course, as an alumni, memories seeping from every corner and crevice.
I enjoyed the conference, and I also enjoyed being the “official” recorder of sorts as well. I only wish I could have done a better job. I had originally intended to (*cough*) “liveblog” the conference, with the vision that I would post entries as soon as possible after the actual presentations and speeches. Unfortunately, I was a bit too optimistic– for one thing, my typing speed is nowhere near 200 wpm, nor is my typing anywhere near 100% accuracy. Throw in technical problems (the power went out the afternoon of the first day, I had some difficulties with the computer the second day), and before you know it, it all snowballed. Unexpected illness and the demands of The Real World stretched out the completion of this blog.
So, I’d like to first thank my readers for their patience; if I ever have the opportunity to cover a conference or convention again, I’ll definitely do my part to ensure timeliness!
I’d like to thank Brian Greenwald and his committee, for asking me to take on this responsibility, and then supporting me throughout. I’d also like to thank the Gallaudet University Press for supporting this endeavor as well– both this blog and the conference.
I’d like to thank the conference attendees for allowing me to get in their face with my camera; I only wish I’d had more opportunities to take more photos, especially more candid shots.
While all the presenters should be acknowledged for their presentations and speeches, I’d especially like to thank Dr. James McPherson, Dr. I. King Jordan, and Dr. Paddy Ladd for agreeing to an interview. I think the interviews allowed the opportunity to expand more on the central points all three wanted to make, and also permitted the audience here at the blog to better understand each man and what they brought to the conference.
The comments you left also made this a fun interactive experience. I would like to specifically thank Barb DiGi, a fellow conference attendee, for her sharp attention to detail. Barb has vlogged a few entries about the conference. I had the pleasure of meeting her, and only wish she’d introduced herself earlier!
I also owe gratitude to Shane Feldman and Jared Evans. Both covered the National Association of the Deaf (NAD) conference last summer in Palm Desert, California, and thus had invaluable experience in covering a conference/convention. Both were generous with their thoughts and insights. Thank you, Shane and Jared!
The suggestions I received from Feldman and Evans (no relation, folks!) helped immeasurably; but in retrospect, there’s more I could have done. That’s always the case, I think. But overall, I think this blog accomplished what it set out to do.
Thanks for joining me. See you at the next Deaf history conference, wherever and whenever it is (I’m considering the possibility of Sweden in 2009. See what happens…)!
Postscript: It has been remarked on here and elsewhere that these individual entries contain a lot of information. I want to make it clear here: NONE of these entries I’ve written are verbatim transcripts. They are SUMMARIZATIONS. Please treat them as such. Additionally, I’d like to again remind everyone that if you use any material here, you need to cite your source. Give credit to myself/this blog, and credit to the original presenter. Thank you.
The One and Only Ridor on 10 Jun 2007 at 1:37 am #
Dave, I enjoyed this blog very much. And I was told by a certain friend that some complained about DHI Conference. Something about the lack of materials or research to bring back home to share or something?
Do you know anything about this issue with DHI Conference? And yes, I hope you will do DHI Conference in the long run. As a fan of PBS, Discovery, History Channel et al, I enjoy reading things like this blog.
Thanks for doing it.
Cheers,
R-
Jean Boutcher on 10 Jun 2007 at 1:48 am #
David,
Dr. George Detmold brought the best out of Stokoe and Gil Eastman! Did anyone present a talk about the famous Dean of
Women Dr. Elisbaeth Peet? Did Harlan Lane attend the conference?
Perhaps you would consider eliciting a wealth of information from the Deaf Studies Department (MJ Bienvenu and Dirksen Bauman).
The One and Only Ridor on 10 Jun 2007 at 8:29 pm #
Jean, I’m not certain that there are wealth of information in Deaf Studies Department.
Try Paddy Ladd or the Deaf Centre at the University of Bristol. They are more outright about Deaf-related research subjects than at Gallaudet.
Don’t be so silly with this subject, jean!
R-
David Evans on 11 Jun 2007 at 1:15 am #
Ridor– not sure about the last DHI conference. I could ask around, though. Thanks for the compliment– we’ll have to see what happens come the summer of 2009!
Jean, Harlan Lane was at the conference, and presented a paper. His presentation was a joint one, with Ulf Hedberg and Richard Pillard, although only Lane spoke. You can find my summarization here at this blog. I’m not sure how much information the Deaf Studies department would have; the best bet for anyone wanting to do research is to first check at the Gallaudet Archives. As someone noted at the conference, most of us who have done research at one time or another know and owe a debt to Ulf Hedberg and Michael Olson.
I don’t think there’s been any particular presentation about Elizabeth Peet, although that might be fascinating. First-hand interviews these days may be difficult though, since she retired more than 50 years ago, and the number of alumni who had direct contact with her have dwindled over the years. This is why it’s important to conduct interviews and research on events and people as early as possible, so that there exists a record from which future researchers can draw on.
nlc on 22 Oct 2007 at 9:22 am #
Check out I knew Elizabeth Peet: Queen of Gallaudet, by Frances M. Parsons - just out on bookshelves. It is a collection of first-hand interviews by Gallaudet alumni about their memories of Miss Peet.