August 4, 2007

It is the Biased Ideology/Philosophy

Many hearing/deaf people now are coming out to speak what they believe is best for deaf children after their years of experience growing up deaf or parents raising their deaf children into adulthood.

They all have different views. Some rather promote the ideology how some successful oral child were able to achieve the ability to speak, but many others speaking up about how some biased ideology/philosophy have already ruined their potential of having good English language, the deprived of cognitive language to learn how to learn. And the parents that have realized American Sign Language should have been taught earlier to have the cognitive language to learn how to learn speech successfully for their deaf child.

As for me, a successful oralist, my speaking ability, from the perspective from hearing people and interpreters, say that I am “actually” a hearing person. And yes, I can talk on the phone too, despite of my 90 db. And I choose to speak up as unbiased person.

Yes, I have chosen to speak up for many of the deaf people in the Community that have been deprived.

I believe that every parent have the right to choose what is best for their child. And I believe that every parent should have the opportunity to learn from all unbiased resources.

Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf is a biased resource organization and I choose to be unbiased resource human being. I have nothing against speech/oral “accessory” education and AGBell/Volta Bureau choose to be biased to be against visual/sign language for deaf babies and school children.

What is important that we all need be unbiased but the problem is that the biased group (i.e. AGBell, AVT, etc) that have the leverage of having millions of dollars to promote their biased ideology.
Money does the talking.

You also have the choice, the right to choose, to be biased or to be unbiased.

Support the Deaf Bilingual Coalition’s work! One way is to donate–by PayPal (and credit cards, too), go to http://www.cad1906.org (California Association of the Deaf)-click Support for the Deaf Bilingual Coalition on the left side. Checks should be made out to “California Association of the Deaf” (be sure to say “Deaf Bilingual Coalition” on your check) and sent care of California Home for the Adult Deaf,
529 Las Tunas Drive, Arcadia, California 91007

Every dollar donated helps to increase awareness and support actions to ensure that signs are not banned from Deaf children’s lives.

John F. Egbert
Deaf Bilingual Coalition
visit: http://www.deafchildrenandsigning.com/index.html

Posted by agbellinfo under Uncategorized |

4 Comments »

  1. So, I have a question. Are you speaking up for all deaf children to have equal access, or is this just a targeted attack on AG Bell. I have found others organizations out there that support Oral only for deaf and hard of hearing children (like the Auditory-Verbal Learning Institute), but have only seen targeted attacks on AG Bell. What gives? If this is truly unbiased, then why not speak up against AVLI, as well.

    Comment by CommonSense — August 5, 2007 @ 4:26 pm

  2. Common Sense,

    Yes, I agree that AVT should be on the list too as they are biased too and I left that out and should have AVT too.

    On AVT mission statement, #8 said no sign language, so they are biased.

    John

    Comment by agbellinfo — August 5, 2007 @ 7:47 pm

  3. Common Sense,

    Read Amy Cohen Efron about AVT
    http://blog.deafread.com/abcohende/2007/08/05/the-greatest-irony-audiologists-response/

    John

    Comment by agbellinfo — August 5, 2007 @ 9:49 pm

  4. AVI and AVLI are two dirrerent organization. A reason why research is so important. AG Bell did absorb AVI, but AVLI is still on it’s own!

    Comment by CommonSense — August 7, 2007 @ 2:25 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. | TrackBack URI

XHTML ( You can use these tags): <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .