I’m disgusted!!!…Look at NIDCD’s Website
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Improving the lives of people who have communication disorders
Take a look at this site;
http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/hearing/asl.asp
It shows the content page about American Sign Language
What is American Sign Language?
Is sign language the same around the globe?
Where did ASL originate?
How does ASL compare with spoken language?
Why does ASL become a first language for many deaf people?
Why emphasize early language learning?
What does recent research say about ASL and other sign languages?
And on the bottom of the content page says;
Additional resources for acquisition of language by deaf children
And guess who is the first on the list to get resources from?
Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing (AG Bell) _3417 Volta Place, NW_Washington, DC 20007-2778_Voice: (202) 337-5220_Toll-free Voice: (866) 337-5220_TTY: (202) 337-5221_Fax: (202) 337-8314_E-mail: info@agbell.org_Internet: www.agbell.org
Was NIDCD aware that AGBell knows nothing about American Sign Language?
I am pretty sure that NIDCD knows that AGBell is a Eugenic Philosophy Organization that bans visual/sign language from deaf babies and deaf school children.
Or is it that NIDCD knew that AGBell would successfully brainwash newly parents of deaf babies before other early intervention group would have a chance to tell the truth about American Sign Language?
And also;
National Cued Speech Association (NCSA)_23970 Hermitage Road_Cleveland, OH 44122_Voice: (216) 292-6213_Toll-free Voice: (800) 459-3529_Toll-Free TTY: (800) 459-3529_Fax: Call for number_E-mail: info@cuedspeech.org _Internet: www.cuedspeech.org
What does Cued Speech Association know about American Sign language?
I wrote an email nidcdinfo@nidcd.nih.gov to NIDCD telling them that National Association of the Deaf should be on the top of the list regardless of the alphabet method of having an eugenic organization first on the list that newly parents would get the “flawed†resources. And please remove those two biased/naive resources from the page.
Do you agree with me? If so, email them and tell them to remove it now!!!
Support the Deaf Bilingual Coalition’s work! One way is to donate–by PayPal (and credit cards, too), go to <http://www.cad1906.org (California Association of the Deaf)-click Support for the Deaf Bilingual Coalition on the left side. Checks should be made out to “California Association of the Deafâ€(be sure to say “Deaf Bilingual Coalition†on your check) and sent care of California Home for the Adult Deaf,
529 Las Tunas Drive, Arcadia, California 91007
Every dollar donated helps to increase awareness and support actions to ensure that signs are not banned from Deaf children’s lives.
Thank you.
John F. Egbert
visit: http://www.deafchildrenandsigning.com/index.html
What does NAD know about language aquisition?? nada.
Comment by Randy — August 3, 2007 @ 7:34 pm
Our great Deaf poet, the late Dr. Clayton Valli, was so upset when he first saw the word DISORDERS in “National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders” in 1989 (?) that he wrote to the editor of The Washington Post, criticising the NIDCD and demanding to delete the word “Disorders”. That is almost 20 years ago. Nothing has changed the mind NIDCD.
Where did English originate?
Where did Latin originate?
Where did Greek originate?
Where did the Protp-Indo-European family
of languages originate?
So unbelievable how myopic NIDCD is (!).
Sad, sad, n’est-ce pas?
Comment by Jean Boutcher — August 3, 2007 @ 7:49 pm
I know I’m going off the subject but I’m more interested in seeing DBC having their own website and being part of it by membership drive, etc. I know you have this DBC donation to CAD site..but isn’t there someting more than that?
Could you elaborate a bit more on that and whether that will happen anytime soon?
Thanks~
Comment by C — August 4, 2007 @ 6:59 pm
C,
We are working on the website now and many others like yourself also want to see DBC to have a website up and this will be the priority
John
Comment by egbertpress — August 4, 2007 @ 7:29 pm